THIRD PARTYCURRENT
Supervisory guidance publication · Market record

EBA publishes final non-ICT third-party-risk Guidelines, not yet applicable

The EBA announced final Guidelines on September 18, 2026. Its status page says they await translation and are not yet applicable; the 2019 outsourcing Guidelines remain listed as applicable and will be repealed only once the new Guidelines apply. The future application date and compliance deadline are not populated on the reviewed page.

What changed

The EBA announced final Guidelines on September 18, 2026. Its status page says they await translation and are not yet applicable; the 2019 outsourcing Guidelines remain listed as applicable and will be repealed only once the new Guidelines apply. The future application date and compliance deadline are not populated on the reviewed page.

This ledger entry preserves a dated market event separately from the maintained company and capability dataset. That distinction matters because an announcement, publication, acquisition, incident update, or research release can be material before there is enough evidence to alter a product comparison or provider classification.

Market consequence

Financial entities can map critical or important non-ICT arrangements and transition work without presenting the final report as a currently applicable replacement.

Buyers should use the event to sharpen diligence and demonstration questions, not to infer an automatic winner or loser. The useful test is whether later evidence shows a change in the governed workflow, data available to the customer, accountability, implementation boundary, or decision record.

Capabilities to revisit

Intake And Inventory

Review the maintained definition, then ask affected providers to demonstrate how the change alters inputs, reviewer judgment, action, evidence retention, and exportability for intake and inventory.

Inherent Risk Tiering

Review the maintained definition, then ask affected providers to demonstrate how the change alters inputs, reviewer judgment, action, evidence retention, and exportability for inherent risk tiering.

Due Diligence And Assessments

Review the maintained definition, then ask affected providers to demonstrate how the change alters inputs, reviewer judgment, action, evidence retention, and exportability for due diligence and assessments.

Regulatory Mapping

Review the maintained definition, then ask affected providers to demonstrate how the change alters inputs, reviewer judgment, action, evidence retention, and exportability for regulatory mapping.

Reporting

Review the maintained definition, then ask affected providers to demonstrate how the change alters inputs, reviewer judgment, action, evidence retention, and exportability for reporting.

Questions for operators

  • Which relationships, systems, services, locations, or decision records could this change affect?
  • Does the event alter policy, evidence, workflow, monitoring, ownership, or only market positioning?
  • What later documentation or direct observation would be required before changing a shortlist or control conclusion?
  • Who owns the follow-up, by when, and what evidence will close or supersede the review?
  • Should prior decisions remain valid, receive targeted reassessment, or be reopened for the complete affected population?

A mature response is proportional. Not every market event should trigger broad reassessment, but every material event should have an accountable disposition and a dated explanation of why the program did or did not act.

How this record will be maintained

Third Party Current will append later evidence when it changes the source claim, scope, availability, affected entities, or market consequence. The original event remains visible so readers can distinguish what was known at the time from what later reporting, documentation, or testing established.

Evidence boundary

The source class for this entry is official eba guidance-status page and press release. It establishes the statements explicitly supported by the linked record at the effective date. It does not establish claims that require direct product testing, an independent investigation, customer outcome data, or later integration evidence.